En español: Guía ciudadana de UM/UIM en Colorado

COLORADO PUBLIC LEGAL LIBRARY · CITIZEN GUIDE

Citizen’s Guide to Colorado Uninsured / Underinsured Motorist Coverage

How Colorado UM/UIM works, who is protected, what must be proved, how liability-side settlement affects the claim, and why current Colorado law must be read together with the declarations page, complete policy, endorsements, damages evidence, and liability-policy disclosures.

Colorado auto-insurance focus · Current-law framework: 2026 · Public legal education

What UM/UIM is

UM/UIM is first-party bodily-injury protection under an auto policy when an insured is legally entitled to recover damages from an uninsured or underinsured motorist. It does not automatically pay merely because a crash was serious or the other driver carried low limits.

Liability-side coverage

Identify the at-fault driver’s legal liability coverage, including any additional owner, employer, commercial, umbrella, excess, or other relevant policies.

Actual damages

Document bodily injury, medical expense, wage loss, impairment, future loss, non-economic damages, and other recoverable damages supported by the evidence.

Your UM/UIM rights

Read the insured-person definition, limits, exclusions, notice provisions, settlement conditions, other-insurance language, and current Colorado statutory and case-law protections.

Practical point: UM/UIM sits between three moving parts—the tortfeasor’s liability coverage, the injured person’s provable damages, and the insured’s own policy and statutory rights. All three must be documented.

Start here — six records to obtain

  1. Declarations page. Confirm UM/UIM limits, named insureds, covered vehicles, policy period, and other listed coverage information.
  2. Complete policy and endorsements. Read the insuring agreement, definitions, exclusions, notice/consent language, limits, other-insurance provisions, and every endorsement.
  3. Liability-policy disclosure. Obtain the at-fault driver’s liability limits, tender, disclosure response, denial or reservation letter, and any known umbrella/excess or other relevant policy information.
  4. Hit-and-run / unknown-driver proof, if relevant. Preserve law-enforcement reports, witness information, photographs, notice timing, and proof of efforts to identify the other driver.
  5. Damages file. Preserve medical records and bills, wage-loss evidence, impairment, future-care proof, treatment chronology, and non-economic-damages evidence.
  6. Settlement and consent record. Before releasing the tortfeasor, give the UM/UIM carrier written notice and address any policy consent-to-settle requirement. Preserve the tender, proposed release, notice, consent request, response, and proof of delivery.

Was UM/UIM selected, rejected, or offered at higher limits?

Colorado’s UM/UIM statute requires minimum UM coverage unless the named insured rejects that coverage in writing. The insurer must also offer UM/UIM limits up to the insured’s bodily-injury liability limits. The minimum-coverage rejection rule and the higher-limit offer are related but distinct.

Minimum coverage

Check whether statutory UM coverage was in force or whether the named insured executed a written rejection permitted by C.R.S. § 10-4-609.

Higher limits

Check the insurer’s offer of enhanced limits, the liability limits in force, the selected UM/UIM limits, and any change in those limits. Airth v. Zurich American Insurance Co., 2018 COA 9, distinguishes written rejection of minimum coverage from declining higher offered UM/UIM limits.

Who is an insured person?

Insured status is policy-specific. Depending on the form, protected persons may include the named insured, resident relatives or rated residents, certain occupants, permissive users, or persons asserting derivative damages because of injury to a covered insured. Do not assume that coverage belongs only to the person who purchased the policy.

Read the actual definition in the issued policy and every endorsement. Household status, vehicle occupancy, permission, residency, and policy-specific wording can change the result.

What makes the other motor vehicle uninsured or underinsured?

No liability insurance
The at-fault motorist has no applicable bodily-injury liability insurance.

Underinsured
The injured person’s compensable bodily-injury damages exceed the applicable legal-liability limits, subject to the policy and current law.

Coverage denial or insolvency
Some forms and statutory provisions address situations in which liability coverage is denied or an insurer becomes insolvent.

Unknown / hit-and-run driver
Special reporting, service, identity, and proof requirements may apply when the alleged tortfeasor cannot be identified or located.

Exhaustion under current Colorado law

Older policy forms sometimes say that UIM benefits are payable only after the tortfeasor’s liability limits have been “exhausted by payment” of settlements or judgments. That wording should not be treated as a complete statement of current Colorado law.

Tubbs — actual payment of the full liability limit is not required

Tubbs v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 2015 COA 70, held that an “actual exhaustion” requirement conditioning UIM coverage on the insured’s actual collection of the tortfeasor’s maximum liability limit is void and unenforceable under C.R.S. § 10-4-609(1)(c). The UIM carrier’s obligation is measured against damages in excess of the tortfeasor’s legal-liability limit, not against whether the insured actually collected that entire limit.

Wenzell — 2026 excess-UIM clarification

In USAA v. Wenzell, 2026 CO 25, the Colorado Supreme Court addressed an exhaustion clause in the excess-UIM context. The Court held that an excess carrier may use an exhaustion clause to define when its layer is reached, but exhaustion must turn on the policyholder’s undisputed damages reaching beyond the underlying limits—not on actual payment of those underlying limits.

Current-law takeaway: distinguish the amount of the underlying legal-liability limits, the amount actually paid in settlement, the claimant’s provable damages, and the attachment point of any primary or excess UM/UIM layer.

Anti-setoff & coverage calculations

C.R.S. § 10-4-609(1)(c) protects the amount of available UM/UIM coverage from being reduced by a setoff from other coverage, including legal-liability insurance, MedPay, health insurance, or other UM/UIM insurance. But the exact benefit calculation still depends on damages proved, policy limits, priority, duplication issues, and current case law.

  • Ask the carrier to identify every claimed offset, credit, reduction, or anti-duplication provision.
  • Demand the exact dollar calculation.
  • Ask for the policy clause and legal authority supporting each reduction.
  • Separate a reduction in available coverage from a calculation designed to avoid paying the same proven damage twice.
  • Check Calderon v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 2016 CO 72, and later authority for MedPay/UM-UIM coordination issues.

Sample policy subjects — educational only

The source page used ten policy-language blocks. They are preserved below as issue-spotting subjects, not as current-form quotations. The actual declarations, policy, endorsements, and Colorado law control any live claim.

A. Insuring agreement — bodily injury

Look for the promise to pay damages the insured is legally entitled to recover from an uninsured or underinsured motorist because of covered bodily injury. Prove legal entitlement, causation, insured status, and damages.

B. Uninsured motorist property damage

Property-damage UM coverage is distinct from bodily-injury UM/UIM. Confirm whether it was purchased and what the declarations and policy actually provide.

C. Notice requirements

Identify notice requirements for the UM/UIM claim and for litigation against the tortfeasor. Send required notices in writing and preserve proof of delivery.

D. Definition of insured person

Determine exactly where the injured person fits within the policy’s insured-person definition. Do not assume only the named purchaser is protected.

E. Definition of underinsured motor vehicle

Underinsured status requires analysis of the applicable liability limits and the insured’s damages. Low limits alone do not establish the amount of UM/UIM benefits owed.

F. Definition of uninsured motor vehicle

Check no-insurance, denied-coverage, insolvency, unknown-driver, and other categories recognized by the policy and current Colorado law.

G. Bodily-injury exclusions

Review delivery, rideshare, fee-use, unauthorized-use, personal-vehicle-sharing, workers’ compensation coordination, punitive-damages, and settlement-related exclusions against current Colorado law.

H. Limits of liability

Read per-person, per-accident, combined-limit, derivative-claim, multi-vehicle, and anti-stacking language with the current statutory framework and applicable case law.

I. Offsets, credits & anti-duplication language

Do not accept older or broad reduction language without checking C.R.S. § 10-4-609(1)(c) and current authority. Ask for a written calculation and legal basis.

J. Other insurance & arbitration

Multiple UM/UIM policies can raise priority, stacking, and other-insurance issues. Arbitration rights depend on the actual policy and governing law; do not assume arbitration is automatic.

Before accepting a denial or low offer

  1. Ask the carrier to identify every policy clause it relies on.
  2. Ask it to identify the claimant’s status under the insured-person definition.
  3. Ask whether the claim is being treated as uninsured, underinsured, unknown-driver, denied-coverage, or insolvency-based.
  4. Ask for a written calculation of every offset, credit, or reduction.
  5. Ask whether the carrier contends an exhaustion requirement has not been satisfied—and compare that position with Tubbs and, if an excess layer is involved, Wenzell.
  6. Ask whether the carrier contends notice, consent, reporting, or cooperation requirements were violated.
  7. Ask whether the carrier’s calculation accounts for C.R.S. § 10-4-609(1)(c).
  8. Ask what additional facts or documents the carrier says it still needs to complete its coverage or benefit evaluation.

Liability settlement & consent-to-settle workflow

The safest practice is to coordinate any liability settlement with the UM/UIM claim before executing a release.

  1. Obtain the liability disclosure and investigate additional liability, umbrella, employer, owner, commercial, or excess coverage.
  2. Obtain the tender letter and the complete proposed release.
  3. Give the UM/UIM carrier written notice of the proposed settlement.
  4. If the policy requires consent, request written consent before signing the release.
  5. Preserve proof of delivery and the carrier’s response.
  6. Identify non-settling parties and whether the release language would affect them.
  7. Identify any subrogation or reimbursement concern asserted by the UM/UIM carrier.
  8. Do not execute the release until the UM/UIM consequences have been evaluated.

Lauric qualification: failure to comply with notice and consent-to-settle provisions can seriously jeopardize a UIM claim, but Colorado applies a notice-prejudice framework. Under Lauric v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co., 209 P.3d 190 (Colo. App. 2009), a settlement made in breach of such provisions is presumptively prejudicial, but the insured has an opportunity to rebut that presumption; if rebutted, the insurer must establish actual prejudice.

Treat every liability release as a coverage event, not merely a settlement document. See also The Global Release Problem and When the Release Is Signed, Truth May Arrive Too Late.

Build the UM/UIM claim file

File sectionPreserve
PolicyDeclarations, full policy, endorsements, selection/rejection forms if disputed, policy period, covered autos, and relevant household-driver information.
Liability sidePolicy disclosures, tender, settlement papers, proposed release, reservation/denial letters, insolvency information, and proof of liability payments.
Crash & faultCrash report, citations, photographs, video, witnesses, diagrams, vehicle damage, and reconstruction evidence if needed.
DamagesMedical records/bills, wage loss, treatment chronology, future care, permanency/impairment, and non-economic damages evidence.
ProcedureUM/UIM notice, claim submission, consent request/response, proof of delivery, carrier correspondence, offset calculations, and arbitration communications.
Hit-and-run / unknown driverPolice report, timing of report, civil-authority notice, photographs, witnesses, service attempts where relevant, and proof that the other driver could not be identified or located.

Place these materials into the Clean Claim System so liability coverage, damages, policy rights, settlement sequencing, and insurer conduct can be reviewed as separate but connected tracks.

Common questions

Is UM/UIM the same as liability coverage?

No. Liability coverage protects an insured against claims by others. UM/UIM is first-party coverage claimed under the injured person’s own policy or another policy that protects that injured person.

Does UM/UIM automatically pay when the other driver has low limits?

No. The claimant still must establish insured status, legal liability, bodily injury, damages, the relevant liability limits, policy compliance, and the amount owed under the governing policy and Colorado law.

Must I actually collect the full liability limit before UIM applies?

Not merely because a policy says so. Tubbs holds that an actual-payment exhaustion requirement is void under § 10-4-609(1)(c). Excess-UIM layers can raise additional attachment questions; Wenzell, 2026 CO 25, ties excess exhaustion to undisputed damages reaching the underlying limits rather than actual underlying payment.

Can the UM/UIM carrier reduce available coverage by the liability payment or MedPay?

Section 10-4-609(1)(c) prohibits reducing the amount of available UM/UIM coverage by setoff from other coverage. The ultimate benefit calculation still depends on damages, limits, duplication, priority, and current case law, so require a written calculation and legal basis.

Should I ask for consent before settling with the at-fault driver?

Yes when the policy requires it. Written notice and advance consent are the safest course. Failure to comply can create a presumption of prejudice under Lauric, but coverage forfeiture is not automatic in every case.

Why does policy disclosure matter?

UIM analysis depends on identifying the full liability-coverage picture, including known umbrella, excess, commercial, owner, employer, and other relevant policies. A single limits letter may not establish the complete legal-liability limits.

Is arbitration automatic?

No. Arbitration depends on the actual policy, any agreement between the parties, and governing law. Check the policy and applicable deadlines rather than assuming arbitration is mandatory or available.

Current Colorado authority map

  • C.R.S. § 10-4-609 — primary Colorado UM/UIM statute, including minimum coverage/rejection, offer of higher limits, underinsured coverage, and anti-setoff protection.
  • C.R.S. § 10-4-610 — uninsured motorist property-damage provisions.
  • C.R.S. § 10-3-1117 and Regulation 5-1-27 — liability-policy disclosure process used to identify tortfeasor coverage.
  • C.R.S. §§ 10-3-1115 and 10-3-1116 — first-party unreasonable delay or denial framework.
  • Tubbs v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 2015 COA 70 — actual exhaustion requirement void and unenforceable.
  • Calderon v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 2016 CO 72 — UM/UIM and MedPay setoff/benefit calculation analysis.
  • Airth v. Zurich American Insurance Co., 2018 COA 9 — minimum written-rejection requirement versus enhanced-limit offer.
  • Lauric v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co., 209 P.3d 190 (Colo. App. 2009) — notice-prejudice framework for consent-to-settle violations.
  • USAA v. Wenzell, 2026 CO 25 — exhaustion in the excess-UIM context turns on undisputed damages, not actual underlying payment.

2026 Colorado Revised Statutes — official source

Colorado Supreme Court — USAA v. Wenzell, 2026 CO 25

Colorado Case Authority Library — VictimsGuide

Colorado Division of Insurance — auto insurance resources

Related VictimsGuide resources

Bottom line

UM/UIM is separate first-party protection. Before accepting a coverage conclusion or signing a liability release, coordinate the actual policy, damages, tortfeasor coverage, disclosure record, settlement/consent process, anti-setoff statute, and current Colorado case law.

Public legal education only. This page does not create an attorney-client relationship and is not individualized legal advice. Every UM/UIM claim depends on its facts, issued policy, endorsements, liability-side coverage, damages proof, notices, settlement documents, limitations periods, and controlling law.