STATE LAW – ALABAMA LIBRARY – GUIDE 18
Alabama Crash Investigation & Evidence Preservation

Preserve evidence on the evidence's timetable, not the lawsuit timetable
Vehicles can be repaired or sold, event data overwritten, platform/phone records deleted and surveillance erased long before a filing deadline expires. Identify each likely evidence source, its custodian and the issue it could prove. Send focused preservation requests with date, vehicle, location and requested categories, and keep delivery proof. Preservation is not the same as compelled access; discovery, subpoena, public-record or consent procedures may still be required.
Alabama spoliation doctrine makes custody, notice, importance and culpability matter
Alabama cases treat purposeful or wrongful destruction of material evidence as spoliation and permit evidentiary or procedural consequences depending on the circumstances. Vesta Fire/Hartung identify factors such as the importance of the destroyed evidence, culpability, fairness, alternative sources and whether a lesser sanction is effective. Do not assume every missing video or discarded vehicle automatically produces an adverse inference; preserve proof of relevance, custody, notice and what happened to the evidence.
Ordinary Alabama crash-negligence claims generally use a two-year limitation framework
Ala. Code § 6-2-38 supplies the general two-year period commonly applied to ordinary personal-injury/negligence claims. Do not treat that period as universal. Municipal claims can require six-month presentment under § 11-47-23, wrongful death has its own two-year-from-death statute, and contract/statutory claims can differ. Calendar each cause of action, presentment requirement, accrual rule and tolling issue separately rather than relying on the insurer's open claim file.
Create an evidence ledger tied to the proposition each item proves
Track the item, custodian, issue, preservation date, request/response, original-file location and authenticity information. Separate fault evidence—speed, traffic controls, visibility, distraction—from injury causation, damages, employment and insurance evidence. Preserve originals and metadata where possible. A crash report can identify leads but should not replace witness development, physical evidence or electronic data when those sources matter to the disputed sequence.
Closing guidance
Preserve Alabama crash evidence immediately and calendar every legal deadline independently. The ordinary two-year tort period is not a reason to wait while evidence disappears or shorter government-notice requirements run.
Authorities and source notes
Ala. Code § 6-2-38 — general two-year limitations framework. Vesta Fire Insurance Corp. v. Milam & Co. Construction and Hartung Commercial Properties — Alabama spoliation/sanction factors. Guide 16 separately controls municipal presentment and government-claim procedures.
- Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l)
- Vesta Fire Ins. Corp. v. Milam & Co. Constr., 901 So. 2d 84 (Ala. 2004); Hartung Commercial Properties, Inc. v. Buffi's Automotive Equipment & Supply Co., Inc. (Ala. 2018)
- Ala. Code §§ 11-47-23, 11-47-192
- Ala. Code § 11-47-192 — Municipal personal-injury notice
Public-interest legal education. Apply the policy and law governing the relevant events and the particular facts. No legal services or attorney-client relationship are created.
