STATE LAW – ALABAMA LIBRARY – GUIDE 10

Alabama Insurance Agents, Applications & Failure to Procure Coverage

VG-AGENT-PROCUREMENTAlabama
Alabama state flag

Identify the coverage the agent actually undertook to obtain

Alabama negligent-procurement analysis starts with what the customer requested and what the agent or broker agreed to procure. Lewis v. Roberts reiterates that once an agent undertakes for compensation to obtain specified insurance, the agent must exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence. Preserve the application, quotes, binder, declarations, endorsements, UM elections/rejections and communications showing the requested limit, insured, vehicle and coverage.

Compare the procurement undertaking with what the carrier actually issued

Before asserting an agent error, obtain the complete policy and every election/rejection document. A coverage may appear absent because it was validly rejected, because a policy exclusion applies, or because the agent failed to perform a specific undertaking. Keep insurer-interpretation and agent-procurement theories separate. The first asks what the issued policy means; the second asks whether the promised insurance was obtained at all.

Causation requires showing that the missing coverage would have responded

Determine whether the requested insurance was available, whether the applicant qualified, what premium/limits would have applied and whether the missing protection would have covered this accident. A negligent-procurement claim seeks loss caused by the failure to obtain the promised insurance, not an automatic award equal to the largest desired policy limit. Preserve the uninsured portion of the loss and other insurance payments.

Use precise requests instead of vague labels such as full coverage

A statement that the customer wanted 'full coverage' may leave unresolved what protection, limit or insured status was requested. The more useful record identifies a specific coverage, limit, vehicle, person or business use and the agent's agreement to obtain it. For statutory coverages such as UM/UIM, also compare the procurement record with any signed rejection or election. The written application and delivery history are central evidence.

Closing guidance

An Alabama procurement claim should identify the insurance specifically requested or promised, what was actually issued, and the loss caused by the difference. Start with the application and policy record, not hindsight alone.

Authorities and source notes

Lewis v. Roberts, 630 So. 2d 355 (Ala. 1993) — agent/broker reasonable-care duty after undertaking to procure insurance and resulting-loss rule. Alabama statutory election/rejection provisions should be checked where the allegedly missing coverage is UM/UIM or another regulated protection.

Public-interest legal education. Apply the policy and law governing the relevant events and the particular facts. No legal services or attorney-client relationship are created.