STATE LAW – ARKANSAS LIBRARY – GUIDE 08
Arkansas Coverage Disclosure & Insurer Duties

Do not confuse proof of insurance with disclosure of the complete policy
The insurance card or financial-responsibility information obtained after a crash can identify an insurer and policy lead, but it does not necessarily disclose every limit, endorsement, insured, umbrella layer or coverage defense. Request the complete accident-date contract and written coverage position voluntarily when possible. Arkansas does not appear in the reviewed authorities to impose a Colorado-style universal pre-suit liability-policy disclosure regime; formal litigation discovery supplies a separate route for qualifying insurance agreements.
Rule 26 provides insurance-agreement discovery in pending litigation
Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(2) permits discovery of the existence and contents of qualifying insurance agreements that may satisfy all or part of a judgment or indemnify or reimburse payments made to satisfy it. This is a litigation discovery rule. Production does not by itself establish admissibility, coverage or the amount owed. Use the rule to identify policies and agreements, then analyze insured status, exclusions, limits and priority separately.
Claims-practice rules support a written explanation, not automatic policy-limit disclosure
Section 23-66-206 identifies unfair claims settlement practices when conduct occurs with the statutory general-business-practice frequency. The listed practices include misrepresenting pertinent policy provisions, failing to act reasonably and promptly on communications, refusing payment without reasonable investigation, and failing to provide a reasonable explanation for a denial or compromise offer. Those provisions make a written, clause-specific explanation useful, but they should not be described as a stand-alone statute requiring every liability insurer to disclose all limits pre-suit.
Keep a disclosure and missing-document log
Record each written request, the recipient, delivery date, response, documents received and remaining gap. Distinguish declarations, policy forms, endorsements, rejection/election records, insurance agreements discoverable in litigation and claim-file material that may raise separate privilege or scope questions. If a carrier gives only a limit or summary, request the form and endorsement supporting any disputed position. When litigation begins, coordinate voluntary information with Rule 26 and other applicable discovery procedures rather than assuming the pre-suit exchange is complete.
Closing guidance
Build the coverage record in writing. Use voluntary requests before suit, Rule 26 for qualifying insurance agreements in litigation, and separate policy analysis to determine what the disclosed documents actually cover.
Authorities and source notes
Ark. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2) — discovery of qualifying insurance agreements in pending litigation. Ark. Code Ann. §§ 23-66-202 and 23-66-206 — regulatory trade-practices framework and unfair claims settlement practices. These authorities do not establish a general Colorado-style pre-suit policy-limit disclosure statute. Exact official source preservation remains open under VG-SRC-005.
Public-interest legal education. Apply the policy and law governing the relevant events and the particular facts. No legal services or attorney-client relationship are created.
